Close Menu
LawLex.OrgLawLex.Org
  • Lex Bulletin
    • Call for Papers
    • Conference
    • Essay Writing
    • News
    • Seminar
    • Moot Court
  • Lex Pedia
    • Lex Articles
    • Lex Review
  • Internships
    • Internship Experience
    • Internship Opportunities
  • Career
    • Career Advice
    • Career Opportunities
  • Courses
    • Classroom Courses
    • Distance Courses
    • Online Courses
  • International Events
  • Videos
  • Misc
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Saturday, July 12
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
LawLex.OrgLawLex.Org
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Our Team
    • Campus Ambassadors
  • News
  • Lex Pedia
    • Lex Articles
    • Lex Review
  • Lex Bulletin
    • Call for Papers
    • Courses
    • Career
    • Internships
    • Interviews
    • CLAT
    • MUN
  • YouTube
  • News
  • Work With Us
  • Contribute
    • Log In
LawLex.OrgLawLex.Org
Case Comment: Sunil Paswan v. State of Bihar – What constitutes an offence under Sec. 307 IPC ?

Case Comment: Sunil Paswan v. State of Bihar – What constitutes an offence under Sec. 307 IPC ?

0
By Vidhya Kumarswamy on May 21, 2017 Lex Pedia, Lex Review
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Case Name: Sunil Paswan v State of Bihar[CR. APP (SJ)-196/2015]

What constitutes a crime under Sec. 307(Attempt to commit murder) of the Indian Penal Code(IPC), 1860 has always been a debatable point due to some of its ingredients being similar to the ingredients for conviction under Sec. 324 (Voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapons or means), Sec. 325(Punishment for voluntarily causing grievous hurt), and Sec. 326(Voluntarily causing grievous hurt by dangerous weapons or means) of the IPC, 1860.

Many attempts have been made to lay out the ingredients for conviction under Sec.307 of the IPC, 1860 like in Sarju Prasad vs State of Bihar(AIR 1965 SC 843), Kaluram vs State of Assam(1977 CRLJ 98), Hari Kishan vs Sukhbir Singh(AIR 1988 SC 2127) and many more.

And the same has been done so in a recent case, by the Hon’ble Patna High Court in Sunil Paswan v. State of Bihar, judgment dated May 16, 2017.  In this case, the Hon’ble Patna High Court endorsed the judgment of Podiyan alias Valuthakunju v. State of Kerala reported in 2017 CRI.L.J. 106, and held that in order to constitute an offence under Sec. 307 IPC, attempt to commit murder, two elements are essential:

  1. the intention or knowledge to commit murder; and
  2. the actual act of trying to commit the murder.

In the same case, the Hon’ble Patna High Court also cited the judgment of the Apex Court of India in Hari Kishan vs Sukhbir Singh(AIR 1988 SC 2127), that:

“Under Section 307 IPC what the court has to see is, whether the act, irrespective of its result, was done with the intention or knowledge and under circumstances mentioned in that section. The intention or knowledge of the accused must be such as is necessary to constitute murder. Without this ingredient being established, there can be no offence of ‘attempt to murder’….”

Many other cases were also referred to in Sunil Paswan’s case. But, all the cases had one thing in common, that for a conviction under Sec. 307 of the IPC, 1860, more emphasis is given to mens rea rather than actus reus.

Click here for the full Judgment.

Also Read:  Apex Court refers dispute on time period of anticipatory bail to larger Constitutional Bench

Stay tuned for more legal news and analysis.

2017 actus reus case analysis Case Comment Case Summary high court Indian Penal Code mens rea Patna High Court State of Bihar Summary Sunil Paswan
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Call for Blogs
Call for Blogs
Support Us

Please enter a description

USD

Please enter a price

Please enter an Invoice ID

WRITE A CASE SUMMARY
CATEGORIES
Recent Posts
  • Invitation to attend International Conclave at The Hague – Legal Frameworks & Global Governance, 2-7 June 2025
  • Why “No Win, No Fee” Is a Cornerstone of Access to Justice
  • What to Do If an Insurance Company Denies Your Personal Injury Claim?
  • What Municipal Courts Serve Anniston AL
  • How to Start a Cannabis Business

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stories handpicked for you.

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.

We respect your privacy and won't spam you

  • Front Page
  • About Us
  • Advertising
  • Calendar
  • Contribute
  • Lawlex Campus Ambassadors
  • Lawlex YT Channel
  • Log In
  • Newsletter
  • Our Team
  • Privacy Policy
  • Register
  • Support Us
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Work With Us
  • Your Profile

Copyright © 2021 All Rights Reserved. For collaborations contact mail.lawlex@gmail.com

All Rights Reserved!
  • Front Page
  • About Us
  • Advertising
  • Calendar
  • Contribute
  • Lawlex Campus Ambassadors
  • Lawlex YT Channel
  • Log In
  • Newsletter
    Featured
    Recent

    Invitation to attend International Conclave at The Hague – Legal Frameworks & Global Governance, 2-7 June 2025

    Apr 17, 2025

    Why “No Win, No Fee” Is a Cornerstone of Access to Justice

    Mar 29, 2025

    What to Do If an Insurance Company Denies Your Personal Injury Claim?

    Mar 5, 2025
  • Our Team
  • Privacy Policy
  • Register
  • Support Us
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Work With Us
  • Your Profile

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.