–Sukriti Singh, University Institute of Law, R.D.V.V.
“Many that live deserve death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgment.” ― J.R.R. Tolkien, The Fellowship of The Ring
The issue of death penalty has been debated, discussed, studied from a prolonged time but till now no conclusion can be drawn about the retention or abolishment of the provision. Death penalty has been a mode of punishment from time immemorial which is practiced for the elimination of criminals and is used as the punishment for the heinous crimes.
Various countries have different outlook towards crime in different ways. In Arab countries they choose the retributive punishment of “an eye for an eye” others have deterrent punishment. Of late there has been a shift towards restorative and reformist approaches to punishment, including in India.
India is one of the 78 retentionist countries which have retained death penalty on the ground that it will be awarded only in the ‘rarest of rare cases’ and for ‘special reasons’. Though what constitutes a ‘rarest of rare case’ or ‘special reasons’ has not been answered either by the legislature or by the Supreme Court.
The constitutional validity of the death penalty was challenged from time to time in numerous cases starting from Jagmohan Singh v. State of U.P where the SC rejected the argument that the death penalty is the violation of the “right to life” which is guaranteed under article 19 of the Indian constitution. In another case Rajendra Prasad v. State of UP, Justice Krishna Iyer has empathetically stressed that death penalty is violative of articles 14, 19 and 21. But a year later in the landmark case of Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab, by a majority of 4 to 1 (Bhagwati J.dissenting) the Supreme Court overruled its earlier decision in Rajendra Prasad. It expressed the view that death penalty, as an alternative punishment for murder is not unreasonable and hence not violative of articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India, because the “public order” contemplated by clauses (2) to (4) of Article 19 is different from “law and order” and also enunciated the principle of awarding death penalty only in the ‘rarest of rare cases’. The Supreme Court in Machhi Singh v State of Punjab laid down the broad outlines of the circumstances when death sentence should be imposed.
Similarly in various other cases the Supreme Court has given its views on death penalty and on its constitutional validity. But the punishment of death penalty is still used in India, some time back the death penalty was given to Mohammad Ajmal Kasab. The Pakistani gunman convicted in 2008 Mumbai attacks was sentenced to death by hanging and after a long discussion, politics and debate was finally hanged on 21 November 2012. Next in the row is Afzal Guru, convicted in 2001 Parliamentary attacks was also hanged after a huge political discussion on 9 February 2013.The next convict in the death row is Devendra Pal Singh Bhullar, convict of 1993 car bombing will be hanged in the coming days as his mercy petition was rejected by the Supreme Court by holding that in terror crime cases pleas of delay in execution of death sentence cannot be a mitigating factor.
[quote]There has been a diverse opinion regarding the death penalty in India as some are in the favor of the retention of the punishment while others are in the favor of its abolishment. Those who are in the favor of death penalty argue that it should be given in the most heinous and rarest of the rare crimes as for example the Delhi gang rape case the demand for death penalty for the accused was raised . But the people who are against the capital punishment argue on the religious, moral and ethical grounds and declare it inhuman and callous investment by unsure and unkempt society. It is also suggested that it should be replaced with life imprisonment or any substitute must be brought out.[/quote]
[highlight]Sanction is an essential ingredient of law. Punishment is a social custom and institutions are established to award punishment, after following criminal justice process. Governments prohibit taking life, liberty or property of others and specify the punishments, threaten those who break the law. Death penalty in India is not completely abolished but given in rarest of the rare cases which in my opinion must be retained for incorrigibles and hardened criminals but its use should be limited to rarest of rare cases so as to reduce the chances of arbitrariness in judicial process and failure of justice.[/highlight]
Case laws referred:
Jagmohan Singh v. State of U.P (1973) 1 SCC 20.
Rajendra Prasad v. State of UP, AIR 1979 SC 917.
Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab,(1979) 3 SCC 727.
Machhi Singh v. State of Punjab ,AIR 1983 SC 957.
law is for social engineering and criminal law always intended to control criminal attitudes existing in a particular society. There are different views with regard to the approaches the law should take. Since serious crimes against individuals is constitutional issue because the perpetrators denies fundamental rights of the victim. Then there is no point in arguing fundamental rights of persons who denied fundamental rights of others through violent criminal acts. Too much stress on human rights creates problems in the society as it is saving criminals who are very keen on denying the same right of others. Such kind of liberalism may lead to increase or support criminal attitudes in the society.
At this juncture death penalty is the eseential santion to be given to increase fear of law.. with the increasing cases of rapes, murder etc and the non implementation of speedy trials is resulting in loosing of faith in judiciary… thus law makers must take some tringent steps…
I have met many rogues and unscrupulous maniacs in India, who are not abated by the imprisonment or any kind of punishment… When India is half full of those kind of men, there’s no security or safety whatsoever for Women especially young women. If the Capital Punishment is ruled out from the Justice system., I am sure there’ll be thousands of criminals who are now loitering in the streets out there would be dare attempt heinous crimes against, not just women, anyone and wish to spend their lives behind bars as they’re not spending their time out of the jail in pleasant manner.. Those men’s frame of mind is that ‘Government affords to feed the inmates when spending time in the jail’ whereas they’re to do hard work to meet both end meet when outside. It is better to retain the Capital punishment than to abolish it. Perhaps, Constitution, as is more than 50 yrs old, needs amendment to suit the needs of the modern and rapidly changing world. On the other hand, we have other important and serious issues to be dealt with and so this issue has to be put on hold.