Case Summary: Bhaurao Shankar Lokhande v State of Maharashtra

0

This post is written by Arohi Ambade, a second-year law student of Maharashtra National Law University, Nagpur.

Title of the Case: Bhaurao Shankar Lokhande v State of Maharashtra

Citation: AIR 1965 SC 1564

Court: Supreme Court

Date of Judgment: 01-02-1965

Appellant: Bhaurao Shankar Lokhande

Respondents: State of Maharashtra

Brief Facts: The appellant, Bhaurao Shankar Lokhande, was married to the complainant Indubai in 1956.  Their marriage was solemnized as per religious rites and customs. During the course time, he married another woman named Kamlabai in February 1962. The complainant then accused the appellant under charges of Section 494 of the Indian Penal Code and accused the appellant’s brother under charges of Section 114 of the Indian Penal Code. Their appeal to the Session Judge was dismissed. Their revision to the High Court also failed.  They have preferred this appeal by special leave.

 Issues:

(1) Whether the second marriage was solemnized by appellant valid or not?

(2) Whether the appellant is guilty under charges of Section 494 of IPC?

Judgment: There was the urge to prove whether the second marriage was solemnized by the way of customary rites performed in the second marriage. Customary rites include two ceremonies namely (1) invocation before the sacred fire (2) Saptapadi. Prima facie, the expression ‘whoever…. marries’ must mean ‘whoever marries validly’ or ‘whoever…. marries and whose marriage is a valid one’. Since no customary and religious rites were performed, the second marriage is completely invalid. If the marriage is not a valid marriage, it is no marriage in the eye of law. If not solemnized, the marriage will not satisfy the first condition of Section 17 and therefore, it cannot be declared void. As a consequence, it will not be an offence under Section 494 of the Indian Penal Code. Henceforth, the appellant is not guilty under charges of Section 494 of the Indian Penal Code and is acquitted.

Also Read:  Case Summary: Santosh Kumar Singh vs. State Through CBI

(Section 494 of IPC- Punishment for bigamy)

Subscribe to Latest Posts !

Subscribe For Latest Updates

Signup for our newsletter and get notified when we publish new articles for free!