CLAT 2026 Analysis
Overall Mood & Nature of the Exam
CLAT 2026 ran smoothly across the country with a very high turnout. Most students described the paper as easy to moderate, well-balanced, and more predictable than the previous year. The structure remained the same: 120 questions, 2 hours, negative marking.
The English and Current Affairs/Legal GK sections were clear scoring zones. The parts that genuinely created pressure were Logical Reasoning and Quantitative Techniques, mostly because of their time-consuming nature rather than raw difficulty.
SECTION-BY-SECTION DEEP ANALYSIS
1. English Language — Easiest Section
- Consisted of short to medium Reading Comprehension passages.
- Questions focused on main ideas, direct inference, tone, and contextual vocabulary.
- No unusual or tricky inferential leaps.
- Anyone with consistent reading practice gained significant marks here.
Why it mattered:
English became the rank-booster this year. Fast readers and those who stay calm under timed passages gained an edge immediately.
2. Current Affairs & General Knowledge — Easy to Moderate
- Questions focused on recent events, national policy updates, global developments, government schemes, and major judicial or constitutional headlines.
- A few static GK questions were linked to current themes.
- Mostly direct recall.
Why it mattered:
Students who made short daily notes and revised monthly current affairs had a huge advantage.
3. Legal Reasoning — Moderate
- Fact-based scenarios requiring application of a legal principle.
- Principles were simple, clear, and not dependent on deep legal knowledge.
- No obscure doctrines or heavy theory.
- The challenge was speed and interpreting facts with precision.
Why it mattered:
A methodical approach — identify the principle → match it to facts → eliminate extremes — consistently produced high accuracy.
4. Logical Reasoning — Moderate to Difficult
This was the most complained-about section.
It included:
- Analytical reasoning sets
- Short argument-based questions
- Strengthen/Weaken
- Assumption identification
- Arrangement-type puzzles
The issue wasn’t the syllabus — it was time pressure. Some sets were multi-layered and required careful step-by-step deduction.
Why it mattered:
Even good students struggled if they spent too long on one set. High scorers used the skip-strategy effectively.
5. Quantitative Techniques — Moderate, Time-Consuming
- Mostly arithmetic, proportional reasoning, percentages, and data interpretation.
- Conceptually easy but required close reading.
- A few questions had tricky framing that slowed students down.is
Why it mattered:
Accuracy was more important than attempting every question. Students who attempted 7–10 questions cleanly outperformed those who rushed all 12–14.
DIFFICULTY SUMMARY
| Section | Difficulty | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| English | Easy | High-scoring |
| GK/Current Affairs | Easy–Moderate | Mostly direct recall |
| Legal Reasoning | Moderate | Needed a calm application |
| Logical Reasoning | Moderate–Difficult | Time trap for many |
| Quantitative Techniques | Moderate | Scoring if selective |
GOOD ATTEMPTS & SMART TIME DISTRIBUTION
High-performing candidates typically followed this pattern:
- English: 20–24 attempted
- GK: 25–30 attempted
- Legal: 22–28 attempted
- LR: 15–20 attempted (carefully)
- QT: 7–10 attempted with accuracy
A realistic “good score” range for strong aspirants fell around 85–95, depending on accuracy.
EXPECTED CUTOFF TRENDS (GENERAL CATEGORY)
(Approximate, based on difficulty & student performance patterns)
- Top NLUs (NLSIU, NALSAR, WBNUJS, NLUD, etc.): 92–98+
- Higher mid-tier NLUs: 85–92
- Lower mid-tier NLUs: 75–85
Category and domicile quotas can shift these ranges significantly.
Important: Even a 3–5 mark swing can drastically move your rank — CLAT has a tight score compression every year.
WHAT THIS PAPER REWARDED
- Reading skill
The exam was reading-heavy. Students who read newspapers/editorials daily breezed through English + Legal + GK. - Exam temperament
Those who resisted panic during tough LR/QT sets did better. - Section visibility
The ability to recognise a question’s difficulty early and skip intelligently saved marks. - Accuracy over aggression
With the paper being moderate, negative marking punished students who overattempted.
A short motivation note for AILET & SLAT aspirants
You’re in the final stretch now. The tough chapters, the long mornings, the confusing passages, the days when nothing made sense — all of that has already been done. You’ve built the ability. You’ve trained your mind. You’re far more prepared than you feel.
When you sit down for AILET or SLAT, remember this:
You don’t need perfection. You only need clarity, calmness, and control. Every question is just one small decision. One read. One thought. One answer. Nothing more.
Your job is not to know everything.
Your job is to stay steady.
If a question looks strange, skip it. If your mind wobbles, breathe once and come back to yourself. You already know how to handle pressure — you’ve been doing it for months.
Trust it. Trust yourself. Trust the process you followed.
And the moment the paper ends, remember:
This exam does not define your worth, but your discipline in these last days will define your result. Give it your whole heart, and let the outcome take care of itself.
You’ve got this.
Go finish the job.

2 Comments
Pingback: CLAT 2026: Conduct Report & Key Highlights | By LawLex.Org - LawLex.Org
Pingback: AILET 2026: Examination Analysis and Review of Conduct | By LawLex.Org - LawLex.Org