Close Menu
LawLex.OrgLawLex.Org
  • Lex Bulletin
    • Call for Papers
    • Conference
    • Essay Writing
    • News
    • Seminar
    • Moot Court
  • Lex Pedia
    • Lex Articles
    • Lex Review
  • Internships
    • Internship Experience
    • Internship Opportunities
  • Career
    • Career Advice
    • Career Opportunities
  • Courses
    • Classroom Courses
    • Distance Courses
    • Online Courses
  • International Events
  • Videos
  • Misc
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Sunday, May 24
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
LawLex.OrgLawLex.Org
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Our Team
    • Campus Ambassadors
  • News
  • Lex Pedia
    • Lex Articles
    • Lex Review
  • Lex Bulletin
    • Call for Papers
    • Courses
    • Career
    • Internships
    • Interviews
    • CLAT
    • MUN
  • YouTube
  • News
  • Work With Us
  • Contribute
    • Log In
LawLex.OrgLawLex.Org
International Copyright Infringement | Case Summary: WWE vs. Savio Fernandes

International Copyright Infringement | Case Summary: WWE vs. Savio Fernandes

0
By Prachi Sahay on Jul 14, 2020 Case Summary, Lex Bulletin
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Case name: World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc v. Savio Fernandes & Ors

Citation: 2015 SCC Del 6716

Judge: Justice Manmohan Singh

World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE) filed a case alleging copyright infringement and dilution of the trademark. WWE is a company incorporated in USA, having offices in various countries including India. It is an integrated media and entertainment company, mainly featuring professional wrestling. Along with weekly shows and occasional pay-per-views, it offers a variety of consumer products like apparel, posters, action figures, etc. The shows feature many wrestlers, who work on-screen characters with different traits. WWE, being the creator of these characters, holds US copyright registrations of their names, catchphrases and other attributes. Along with this, it also has registrations over the mark ‘WORLD WRESTLING ENTERTAINMENT’ and the WWE Scratch Logo.

The Defendant’s infringing products

The defendants are proprietors of a shop and online store, which claim to be selling official WWE merchandise. The plaintiffs came across the defendant’s websites www.wrestlezoneindia.com and www.wrestlezone.co.in, which sell a number of products bearing names and logos belonging to WWE. In fact, they openly called themselves ‘The WWE Merchandise Store’, incorporating the scratch logo. The plaintiff then hired an independent investigator to ascertain the extent of the defendant’s activities. The findings of the independent investigator brought to light the other stores maintained by the defendant. He also bought some goods from the shop. The products were a copy of the authentic products with minor defects. Some had the neck tags torn out, some lacked the registration “®” symbol, and some prints were different.

The Plaintiff’s arguments

  1. WWE submitted that it is the creator of the characters, and holds copyright over their depiction. Both the public and the wrestlers themselves recognise these rights. The defendants illegally represented these characters and the sold products in their name without WWE’s permission. This was a blatant infringement of the Plaintiff’s copyright rights under the Copyrights Act, 1957.
  2. The defendant’s unauthorised use of WWE’s intellectual property disillusioned the consumers. Since WWE characters are immensely popular, selling their merchandise mislead the public into believing that the defendants were associated with WWE.
  3. The defendants also used the WWE trademark without permission. They also used the names of WWE talent like John Cena, Rey Mysterio, etc. This is unauthorised use of their trade name and an infringement of registered trademarks.
  4. This infringement not only harmed the plaintiff but resulted in unjust enrichment of the defendant. They mislead the public into buying counterfeit goods by using the plaintiff’s reputation.
  5. The Plaintiff then pointed out that the defendants claimed to be selling ‘Officially Licensed WWE Merchandise’. This has damaged the plaintiff’s goodwill.
  6. The unrestricted use of WWE’s trademark would gradually erode the uniqueness and exclusivity of the trademarks. Therefore, the defendant’s activities need to be curbed immediately.
Also Read:  Call for Papers: Trends in Intellectual Property Research [Volume III Issue II] [Submit By 29th December]

The Court’s response

Summons and notices were issued to the defendants. However, they failed to respond. Considering this, the court passed a temporary injunction order against them. This restrained the defendants and their partners from selling, displaying, advertising or dealing with WWE’s registered trademarks. Additionally, two Local Commissioners were sent to examine the defendant’s goods. They found that 267 goods were counterfeit, infringing the plaintiff’s trademark. The defendants still failed to show up, while the plaintiff presented evidence to back its claims. The defendant’s non-appearance meant no rebuttals or cross-examinations.

The plaintiffs claimed Rs 10,00,500 as damages for the infringements. They referred to numerous judgements to back this claim. After hearing the proceedings, the court awarded a sum of Rs 5,00,000 to the plaintiff, along with a permanent injunction order against the defendants.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Call for Blogs
Call for Blogs
Support Us

Please enter a description

USD

Please enter a price

Please enter an Invoice ID

WRITE A CASE SUMMARY
CATEGORIES
Recent Posts
  • CfP: National Seminar on ‘Music, Mental Health and Law’ by NUALS, Kochi | Submit by June 10
  • Webinar on ‘India’s Legal Reforms on Aviation’ by International Bar Association | Register by may 29
  • Panel Discussion: Clicks, Claims and Calories – Food Advertising in a Digital First India, NLS Bangalore
  • MGMUN 2026 at CSI Institute of Legal Studies, Cheruvarakonam, Kerala
  • Internship Opportunity at the Office of the Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks (CGPDTM)

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stories handpicked for you.

Thank you for subscribing.

Something went wrong.

We respect your privacy and won't spam you

Copyright © 2021 All Rights Reserved. For collaborations contact mail.lawlex@gmail.com

All Rights Reserved!
  • Front Page
  • About Us
  • Advertising
  • Calendar
  • Contribute
  • Lawlex Campus Ambassadors
  • Lawlex YT Channel
  • Log In
  • Newsletter
    Featured
    Recent

    CfP: National Seminar on ‘Music, Mental Health and Law’ by NUALS, Kochi | Submit by June 10

    May 23, 2026

    Webinar on ‘India’s Legal Reforms on Aviation’ by International Bar Association | Register by may 29

    May 23, 2026

    Panel Discussion: Clicks, Claims and Calories – Food Advertising in a Digital First India, NLS Bangalore

    May 23, 2026
  • Our Team
  • Privacy Policy
  • Register
  • Support Us
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Work With Us
  • Your Profile

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.